[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Explosion Proof Detection

Subject: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
From: "alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:14:13 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <aJU1n.29572$Gf3.17409@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <%%U1n.3400$5m.2266@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <hi96ju$oqv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bob La Londe wrote:
 > Yep.  Still figured I would give it a shot.  If they had not turned
> down the cost on the video system I would be a little more gungho on
> the detection stuff.  I can't see how detection would be cheaper...
> and work.

Why explosion proof, isn't it outside?

--
js

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: Bob La Londe

References:
- Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: alarman
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: Bob La Londe

Prev by Message: Re: OT Funny movies.
Next by Message: Re: OT: Funny pic. (If you're not the soldier)
Previous by thread: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
Next by thread: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home