[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSC ESN Conversion

Subject: Re: DSC ESN Conversion
From: mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <hjg6jg$tim$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hjg6q8$tim$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bff53d08-8a7a-4338-b47d-629968059ab6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vKR6n.62753$PH1.30895@edtnps82>

On Jan 24, 12:26=A0am, CH=AEIS <s...@xxxxx> wrote:
> "mleuck" wrote...
>
> > Too bad they couldn't make a dual-frequency receiver
>
> There is the PC5320...http://www.dsc.com/index.php?n=3Dproducts&o=3Dview&=
id=3D43
> (may need to login to view)
>
> Not exactly what you're looking for, but it looks like it'll at least sav=
e
> you from replacing all the old 900 Mhz devices.
>
> - Chris

You can't mix and match which is what I imagine most people would
want. The main advantage to the 5320 is expanding coverage

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSC ESN Conversion
  - From: alarman

References:
- DSC ESN Conversion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: DSC ESN Conversion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: DSC ESN Conversion
  - From: mleuck
- Re: DSC ESN Conversion
  - From: CH®IS

Prev by Message: Re: DSC 832 on Cable VoIP
Next by Message: Re: DSC ESN Conversion
Previous by thread: Re: DSC ESN Conversion
Next by thread: Re: DSC ESN Conversion
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home