[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: lightning

Subject: Re: lightning
From: "petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:22:38 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <VJudnb6eNNjpODPXnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


"Christopher Glaeser" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de groupe
de discussion : VJudnb6eNNjpODPXnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> With growing numbers of POE cameras mounted outdoors which are connected
> directly to a LAN with expensive computers and NAS and other equipment,
> how does one minimize the potential damage that can be caused by a
> lightning strike?
>
> Best,
> Christopher
>
>
>

Simple..

use different switch for both system..

one for the security camera, the other for the rest of the lan..

And at the same time you are giving yourself a chance of bottlneck caused by
the mixing of the 2 data..

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lightning
  - From: Christopher Glaeser

References:
- lightning
  - From: Christopher Glaeser

Prev by Message: Re: OT: Another Republican Lie About Healthcare Debunked
Next by Message: Re: OT: Foulball
Previous by thread: lightning
Next by thread: Re: lightning
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home