[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT: Foulball

Subject: Re: OT: Foulball
From: ken ney <yodeler123@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <YeWdnWlokrNd7DXXnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <cb1b372b-3043-4992-b9a8-c6860e9c52a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <r00qm.22035$ec2.8904@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4aa8e50d$0$602$c5fe31e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <UeidnY3ocN50rDTXnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4aa97efa$0$599$c5fe31e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hg0ka51jon478lh22ogs2f358avd0viur4@xxxxxxx>

On Sep 11, 3:55=A0am, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:34:18 -0400, "Kid" <k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_adminis...
>
> >as =A0of noon thursday. =A0read it and weep.
>
> Depends on who you ask.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_rating
>
> The last idiot to hold the office ended his term with 25% approval.
>
> I don't take the polls seriously though, the sample size is to small.

Does anyone know where I can find a forum that discusses security and
alarms?  This one seems to deal mostly with personal vendettas and
politics, even the threads with legitimate security discussions seem
to be inevitably steered off course.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Foulball
  - From: Doug
- Re: OT: Foulball
  - From: too fat for a ladder

References:
- Re: OT: Homerun
  - From: too fat for a ladder
- Re: OT: Homerun
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: OT: Homerun
  - From: Kid
- Re: OT: Homerun
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: OT: Foulball
  - From: Kid
- Re: OT: Foulball
  - From: G . Morgan

Prev by Message: Re: lightning
Next by Message: Re: want to see Bass trying to get out of an argument that he cant win?
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Foulball
Next by thread: Re: OT: Foulball
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home