Re: A "HUH" phone call

[too fat for a ladder <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>]

On Sep 4, 2:35 am, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> binkyview.com
> ?
>
> --
> **Crash Gordon**
>
> "too fat for a ladder" <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:9907a8bf-9943-4edb-8a9d-2b8903cee6b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > On Sep 3, 11:13 pm, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> mleuck wrote:
> >> > On Sep 2, 10:35 pm, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> OH...how much is that...so I tell her the service call is free if
> >> >> you're
> >> >> going to be monitored and the battery is 40 bucks. OH ok. But you can
> >> >> just
> >> >> use it as it is without being monitored but you'll still need a
> >> >> service call
> >> >> and battery (the one that's in there is 13 years old).
> >> >> --
> >> >> **Crash Gordon**
>
> >> > Service call is free but the battery is 40 bucks? If it were Brinks
> >> > quoting that everyone here would be going nuts
>
> >> Brinks doesn't do services calls. That would hurt their image.
>
> >> Jim Rojas <
>
> > I heard a rumor that someone owns the web domains NewBrinks.com,
> > NewBrinks.net, FreeBrinks.com, and FreeBrinks.net. Imagine the
> > confusion it would create if those websites were launched by a
> > security company, or if those sites were blogs for clients expressing
> > their disapproval with the old Boinks?
> > I also heard a rumor that those sites are up for auction, but hey this
> > all sounds like a shameless shill aimed at people with a bone to pick
> > with Broadscrew Security. <

I'll race you to see who can buy BrinksViewSecurity.com first :-)