Re: Which system is better?

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sep 6, 7:04=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 5:10=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 6, 12:25=A0pm, too fat for a ladder <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote=
:
>
> > > On Sep 5, 10:38 pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 5, 11:05 am, Frank Olson
>
> > > > <use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > If so, the operators don't even see the alarm if it's turned of=
f
> > > > > > by the client within 30 seconds.
>
> > > > > We don't use a dialler delay (if that's what you're meaning). =A0=
I have
> > > > > yet to see a client disarm a system within 30 seconds of an alarm=
,
>
> > > > That's a joke right? Most customers I've seen have no problem
> > > > disarming within that amount of time, if they can't then they've
> > > > forgotten the code or something. <
>
> > > 90% of the bullshit would be solved if these lemonheads would start
> > > using 2 way voice, but why spend a few extra bucks on something that
> > > might save a life or reduce false dispatches?
> > > Dialer delays further expose the end user's safety and security in a
> > > true emergency. Dialer delays should be tossed out the door.
>
> > I second the 2-way voice recommendation
>
> RHC: Whaaaat....are you guys joking? This is what Alarmfarce push in
> their bullshit pitches.....Tom, this is NOT funny......:)))

So what? It doesn't matter who does it that feature is great for
reducing false alarms