[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL864

Subject: Re: UL864
From: "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:02:33 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <LN7ym.114$925.42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hada6r$qaj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NfSdneTGmKHoz0jXnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pt6dnT9ixKAAHUjXnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Robert L Bass" <Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Pt6dnT9ixKAAHUjXnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Just Looking" wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but no matter what it will still be a Napco, son of MA3000.
>
> The MA3000 is a great panel.  I installed lots of them on commercial
> projects.

I like the Gem panels better than the MA panels myself.  I really like the
X255, and I am looking forward to the new commercial fire/burg panel.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UL864
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- UL864
  - From: ABLE1
- Re: UL864
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: UL864
  - From: Just Looking
- Re: UL864
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Bob LaLonde
Next by Message: DSC 5400 info needed
Previous by thread: Re: UL864
Next by thread: Re: UL864
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home