[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders

Subject: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
From: "alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:57:39 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <20090930032945.414961A7BA3@xxxxxxxxxxx> <h9vokq$u3b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <22bead37-37dc-4e3d-9cfb-5829d1b8f5f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ha0e3j$v6f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <23Pwm.196356$8B7.55950@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <71fb49e7-5b5e-4f8a-8bb5-3fa43a85c6cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jim wrote:
> I don't think I've ever heard of a little pussy hurting anyone. Cute
> OR ugly.

Heh, tell that to Bill Clinton.

--
js

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
  - From: Jim

References:
- Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: Uh-Huh?
Next by Message: Re: GEM-P3200 on/off report
Previous by thread: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
Next by thread: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home