[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders

Subject: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
From: Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <20090930032945.414961A7BA3@xxxxxxxxxxx> <h9vokq$u3b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <22bead37-37dc-4e3d-9cfb-5829d1b8f5f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ha0e3j$v6f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <23Pwm.196356$8B7.55950@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <71fb49e7-5b5e-4f8a-8bb5-3fa43a85c6cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <U0Oxm.39108$6f4.12120@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Oct 3, 3:57=EF=BF=BDpm, "alarman" <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jim wrote:
> > I don't think I've ever heard of a little pussy hurting anyone. Cute
> > OR ugly.
>
> Heh, tell that to Bill Clinton.
>
> --
> js
>
> Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Cigars don't count.

References:
- Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
  - From: Jim
- Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: System recommendations
Next by Message: DSC PC5590CL
Previous by thread: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
Next by thread: Re: ADM Monitoring Are Bottom Feeders
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home