Re: Simplex wants Union workers to install there product

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 18, 9:39=A0pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> JoeRaisin wrote:
> >I'm not trying to be political - just asking how you can continue to
> >speak to something as a given when I have seen no evidence to support
> >your speculations. =A0I am, however, open to be enlightened...
>
> This was widely studied when the hoax email about Bush having a 91 IQ and
> Clinton with 182 or something. =A0Those numbers are completely inaccurate=
 and
> Snopes has debunked it.
>
> An actual scientific paper* was published and widely believed to be accur=
ate.
>
> I could not find the text in it's entirety, but here is the relevant page=
 with
> the estimates (Clinton has about 20 IQ points on GWB) (Oh, and John Quinc=
y
> Adams is estimated at a whopping 175!):
>
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_OqiKkTj5eBg/SXU8QOhKUZI/AAAAAAAAAZw/AgCyPxi...
> from:http://inductivist.blogspot.com/2009/01/having-high-iq-for-prez-aint=
-...
>
> Full text here for $$$:http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/1186279=
66/abstract
>
> Interesting read:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article634182.e=
ce
>
> * Article Information
> Presidential IQ, Openness, Intellectual Brilliance, and Leadership: Estim=
ates
> and Correlations for 42 U.S. Chief Executives
> Dean Keith Simonton
> Political Psychology
> Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages511 - 526
> 2006 International Society of Political Psychology

If I recall Carter was considered intelligent, look where that went