Re: Tech-man.com New FTP Server

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

They have been playing the Brink's brand name since day one. Even though
they were never really Brinks at all. They never were. XYZ company
DBA/Brinks Home Security. They are just a company that suckered The
Brinks Company into allowing them to use their trademarked name. They no
longer want to pay the parent company 30+ million a year for just the
use of the name. Now that the cat is out of the bag, people will soon
realize just how duped they really were. Were still the same people,
just a different name BS...yeah right.

All those worthless proprietary systems they use. All those stickers and
yard signs...they all have to go. They will spend more than 90 million
the first year just renaming all the business cards, stationary, trucks,
building signs, contracts, etc. They will be eating that for lunch for
the next 5+ years. The treehuggers will not be happy about that. :)

Jim Rojas




Jim wrote:
> On Apr 19, 7:45�am, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It has been a year since the Salem witch hunt trial. I am still here,
>> and Brinks has more pressing concerns with their loss of the Brinks
>> brand name. Plus the economy must be pushing their attrition rate
>> through the roof.
>>
>> Corporations like Brinks lie to suit their needs. If you read their
>> latest stockholder reports, they claim very little customer loss. We all
>> know those claims are BS and they are just making their white elephant
>> look as profitable as possible for a prospective buyer.
>>
>> Their spinoff will most likely fail. Msybe not right away, but they will
>> try to sell the company to some overseas investment firm before they
>> jump ship.
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>>
>>
>>
>> Frank Olson wrote:
>>> Jim Rojas wrote:
>>>> I wasn't aware of any gag order...
>>>> Jim Rojas
>>> Well, I "gag" every time I think about what they did to you... �Our
>>> justice system is definitely broken... �When a company with obviously
>>> "deep pockets" can crush someone just because they feel like it... �That
>>> totally sucks!!!-
>
> Having to change their name doesn't require them to divest themselves
> of the business. I don't think they'll do that. I think that they
> think of this "thing" as a cash cow and couldn't bring themselves to
> get rid of it. Even if they there was some lag in business .... for
> whatEVER reason.
>
> Just speculation on my part though.