[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: pc5010 prog ?

Subject: Re: pc5010 prog ?
From: G. Morgan <usenet_abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <49f3eb79$0$89873$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f064890b634858091b68de0900154652np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49f499a9$0$89878$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33d996b7-936b-4ea2-83d4-3ffaf5955e18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

mleuck wrote:

>On Apr 26, 12:28 pm, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>> on second thought that's pretty weird...a company (ADT) that sends  test
>> signals once a month has o/c's locked on???
>>
>> --
>> **Crash Gordon**
>
>
>It isn't locked, G's been drinking again

No, I haven't you weenie.  I may be mistaken about the o/c lockout but there
was definitely some report codes that could not be disabled on ADT's version
of the 5010.

References:
- pc5010 prog ?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: pc5010 prog ?
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: pc5010 prog ?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: pc5010 prog ?
  - From: mleuck

Prev by Message: Re: pc5010 prog ?
Next by Message: Re: Anyone using perimiter fence protection
Previous by thread: Re: pc5010 prog ?
Next by thread: Re: pc5010 prog ?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home