Re: Tech Help May 2008

["Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well I wonder if a certain attorney is paying a finders fee for new
"business". It seems like you have made it possible for that attorney to
really give you the business.
I think this is a Homer Simpson moment. If you get served just say "D'oh!"


"George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0PRTj.771$Yp.276@xxxxxxxxxxx
> You mean Brinks can sue us for the over 200 panels I have reprogrammed to
> our station.
>
> Your kidding right?
>
> It only takes about 5 min. to walk in and reprogram the systems eprom.
>
> What is the problem with that?
>
> "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
> news:OnuTj.115836$Cj7.108582@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Anonymous wrote:
> >> The latest version can be downloaded from this location:
> >>
> >> http://techman.sbfs.eu/
> >>
> >> I will be posting this message each month because Jim Rojas has been
> >> instructed not to do so.
> >>
> >> Thank you one and all.
> >>
> >> Nigel Tenner
> >>
> >
> >
> > If you seriously want to help Jim, you should stop posting this.  You
> > obviously have no idea what his situation is.  He's facing criminal
> > contempt charges and this group is being monitored by attorneys that are
> > acting for Brinks.  Instead of posting this nonsense, you should be
> > posting the links to all the web sites that display supposed Brinks
"IP".
> > Perhaps this will help them find someone with deeper pockets that will
> > actually face them off in a courtroom.  The judgment they obtained
against
> > Jim is useless.  Boinks probable spent more that triple that in legal
fees
> > alone, and for what??  They didn't come away with anything that
> > definitively identifies their intellectual property rights.  Worse, Jim
> > can still file for an appeal and I believe he would have good grounds to
> > launch a counter-suit for harassment and tortuous interference.
>
>