Re: California Compliant Ademco Alarmnet 7845I-GSMG

["Sue" <sodom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I thought that was just for displays.

http://www.dscr.dla.mil/userweb/AviationEngineering/HTIS/articles/CaliforniaRestrictionofCertainHazardousMaterialsAdheretoEuropeanUnionDirective.htm


"Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3OIyj.30618$H05.14297@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:lbadnS0nMb0VyVbanZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> I'm noticing in the Ademco brochure for the 7845I-GSM that there is a
>> version ending GSMG that is "California Compliant".   What are the issues
>> with California that require a different version?
>>
>> Is there similarly a California version of the normal GSM / SMS only
>> version the 7845-GSM?
>>
>>
>> Will
>>
>
> I believe California has adopted a version of the European RoHS directive
> which restricts the amount of certain hazardous materials in electronic
> devices. Its possible that's the reason but I really don't know for sure.
>
> Doug
>