Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41

["RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_usa@/nospam/hotmail.com>]

Theres a point  in the text  that exempts  businesses  with 500,000.00  in
revenue  from some section of the bill..
Now who do you think  that favors.. (sure not the little guy)   no big
secret for me to see who's behind the thing...


"tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:55f53a16-5e23-4ec2-a402-0e58d471da83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Mar 19, 10:00 am, Frank Olson
> <use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > RockyTSquirrel wrote:
> > > Kentucky installers  beware of Kentucky house bill  HB-41..
> >
> > > if passed  prepare to pay out the ass for licenses..
> > > yearly schooling (big expenses)
> > > yearly renewals (bigger expenses)
> > > insurance upgrades (biggest expenses)
> >
> > > a new government agency to regulate your ever move..
> >
> > If it's set up correctly I can big benefits for installers and
> > technicians as well.  Many states regulate the alarm industry.  Do you
> > know what state Kentucky is going to model their alarm bill on??
>
> RHC: Regulation, intelligently done (rare), and controlled in some
> fashion so it doesnt't morph into another revenue generating,self
> serving government regulatory agency, can benefit our industry by
> ensuring standards are met for those who serve the security buying
> public. But in spite of those benefits, what it can also do is drive
> those "little alarm dealers" out of the industry who for one reason or
> another just don't want to be bothered with this, or who refuse rto
> obey on principle. This leaves more potential victims exposed for the
> ADT's and other Borg companies to gouge even more of buying public,
> since they WILL take the time and put up with the extra expense to
> follow any level of regulation. They must be smiling all the way to
> the bank...
>
> I don't know the nature of these new regulatory restrictions, so I
> can't say this will happen for sure, but is just seems like another in
> a long list of actions taken by governments to improve things, but
> which more often than not, turn out to have just the opposite effect.
>
> I guess we'll just have to wait and see......
>