Re: Monotronics

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47953bc0$0$6480$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What is it exactly you are trying to defend here? Your reputation? The
> company's reputation? The truth is ALL you guys screwed the pooch big
time.
> No one gives a rats ass which friggin' department did what, so your MAD
> magazine defense doesn't cut it. Besides, according to you you're the one
> guy that trained everyone (except when you claim you don't remember
> anyone).

You were the one who claimed hush money and supposedly how I somehow know
everything about everyone there and what they are doing. And the fact you
spent well over 2 months from the initial statement until your explaination,
in between that was babel

Did you know what Gus is doing all the time?

> You don't care about what kind of foul ups happen at Monitronics, to
> you it's just another whining customer to screw and then ignore. I've
never
> heard you say one thing about trying to implement a procedure to make
> certain nothing like this happens again.

Well gee since I'm not a supervisor it's not up to me now is it? I suppose
in your mind I should be telling everyone else what to do

> Until Monitronics goes broke paying
> for its screw ups, I guess it will just be business as usual.

It sounds like you need to have another conversation with Trixie/Tracy
again, she tells a much different story than you