[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moose 2000

Subject: Re: Moose 2000
From: "alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:32:31 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <596dnZZWRpQyixTanZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <478962b3$0$30516$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47899eb2$0$31798$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478a3c23$0$26075$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <KMsij.298278$Fc.234249@attbi_s21> <478a4eab$0$26010$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <nuwij.34352$Ux2.28465@attbi_s22>

RockyTSquirrel wrote:
> the idea behind the 2 digit  arm  was to allow someone (ie.. maid,
> cleanup crew, workmen, etc...) to arm the system.
> But the same people could not disarm the system  since  you would
> need all 4 digits to do that..
> RTS


Thanks for clearing that up. :-)

--
js





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Moose 2000
  - From: Rich
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: RockyTSquirrel
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose 2000
  - From: RockyTSquirrel

Prev by Message: Re: Hollywood and Alarm Systems
Next by Message: Re: SYGMA Fire Protection Engineering
Previous by thread: Re: Moose 2000
Next by thread: Re: Moose 2000
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home