Re: AlarmNet reliability how can it go down with no notice?

["alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>]

motley me wrote:
> J.           <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net> wrote in
> news:dhfcq31d9rt4k3c49snviatbf7g4gd35fd@xxxxxxx:
>
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:37:13 -0800 (PST), Roger W <allucan8@xxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 2, 4:42 pm, Jerry <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I use AlarmNet as my primary method of protection.
>>>
>>> Cellular and Radio were not intended for primary alarm
>>> transmissions. If you are serious about your security, get an old
>>> fashioned POTS landline and back it up with Alarmnet. Its still the
>>> most reliable combination. I would not use voip if I didn't have to.
>>
>> POTS is no where near the most reliable method of communication
>> regardless of the backup used.  It is impossible to provide line
>> security with POTS as required by DCID 6/9, UL2050, the NISPOM, etc.
>> The most reliable means of alarm transmission are encrypted direct
>> connections, two-way long range radio, and NIST approved IP
>> communicators such as DMP's ICOM-E and Alarmnet's 7845i.
>>
>
> Maybe, but he's responding to a home owner. Not many homeowners are
> going to put in an encrypted dedicated line hust for their alarms.

He knows that. He was flexing.

--
js

- The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
( Also, the harder they bite, punch, and kick.)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com