[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ademco wireless system

Subject: Re: Ademco wireless system
From: "Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:12:52 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <46ee17f2$0$19604$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <59ed242c270c9bb7b7e0cc0435c2df7d@xxxxxxxxx> <46f08145$0$32525$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I suspect very soon the loquaciousness will disappear into the laconic.

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46f08145$0$32525$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:59ed242c270c9bb7b7e0cc0435c2df7d@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Roland More said:
>>
>> >Until Bosch gives up their anal witch hunt I'll keep quiet. It is enough
> to
>> >know there is a back door despite official statements to the contrary.
>>
>> I have a solution!  Why don't you talk about hypothetical alarm panels
> that
>> might hypothetically use lithium batteries and hypothetical hand-held
>> programmers? :-)
>>
>> - badenov
>
> And the fact that I should know all about this but because of my position
> can't say anything about it
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ademco wireless system
  - From: Jim

References:
- Re: Ademco wireless system
  - From: Roland More
- Re: Ademco wireless system
  - From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: Ademco wireless system
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: give me your thoughts
Next by Message: Re: Hey, Roland...
Previous by thread: Re: Ademco wireless system
Next by thread: Re: Ademco wireless system
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home