[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: NX591Egsm

Subject: Re: NX591Egsm
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:30:49 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <j3RFi.43447$7e6.577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <LjuGi.6670$Af1.4451@trnddc06> <mSPIi.55460$Y7.51337@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vXQIi.118487$dI1.91099@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"shotgun boogie" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vXQIi.118487$dI1.91099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Disco wrote:
> > Robert Le'Ass wrote:
>
> > This is a commonly held misconception about the sunset clause. There is
no
> > requirement that analog support be dropped on the
> > appointed date.
>
> Cell carriers can't wait to shake that monkey off their backs. Jeeeez
you're
> stupid.
> js

True and it doesn't have to be dropped, some carriers like AT&T are severely
restricting access

References:
- NX591Egsm
  - From: Mick
- Re: NX591Egsm
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: NX591Egsm
  - From: Disco
- Re: NX591Egsm
  - From: shotgun boogie

Prev by Message: Re: LOCKED PANEL
Next by Message: Re: Intellisense FG-730 on Napco P3200
Previous by thread: Re: NX591Egsm
Next by thread: Re: NX591Egsm
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home