[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Napco Wireless Reporting
"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47051972$0$20564$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes it does send by zone on low battery. What I said was it didn't send by
> zone (GEM 9600) when it misses a transmitter check it signal. In Contact
ID
> that only reports as a generic expansion module failure.
Hmmm... I don't think I've got any 9600s running wireless, but I'm sure I
can emulate a sensor polling failure and see exactly what it does on a
P1632. One thing I can say is that I noticed some inconsistency in how
P9600s operate and handle some things a few years back when they were
changing versions. I do have a 9600 in my house. I suppose I could stick
on a receiver just to test what happens and see what it reports exactly.
>
> "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4705089f$0$18339$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Yes it does send detailed information. This is cut and pasted directly
> from
> > the CS log for a P1632.
> >
> > Thu 10/04/07 04:38:41 TROUBLE-REST> Area #1-370: (#30) (PROTECTION
> LOOP)
> >
> > Thu 10/04/07 03:39:30 SYS SERVICE>
> > >SENT: AUTOMATIC DEALER NOTIFICATION
> >
> > Thu 10/04/07 03:39:27 TRBL-SUP> Area #1-384: (#30) (SENSOR LOW BATT)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home