[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

Subject: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
From: Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:21:56 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <470BFCC8.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <sL1Pi.8610$Da.1211@pd7urf1no> <470cd9ca$0$18986$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <705Pi.8402$th2.930@pd7urf3no>

Yes they are. I still have some I haven't bothered to add yet.

Jim Rojas





Frank Olson wrote:
> Jim Rojas wrote:
>> It's already in the works. I will have 2 site mirrors up by the weekend.
>>
>> Thanks Frank
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>
>
> I take it that all the claims and motions posted on your site are
> considered "public record" since they're filed in a Court of Law.  I
> have this FAQ page.  I've also been thinking that it's time to update it.

References:
- Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: RLB, is that you?
Next by Message: Unlocking Vista 15P3 (Monitronics Boards)
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home