Re: The latest Brinkle in my life

["Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Wow, looks like they shut you down.


"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:iVOWi.168844$1y4.87484@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
> (Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
> which I'm currently hosting at http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm
> is far too "controversial" for them.  They have given me twenty-four hours
> to remove it, or they'll cancel my account.  I find it interesting that
> they are still unable to point out where I've violated their terms of
> service other than referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't
> provide much in the way of information (although it is cleverly worded to
> "push" all the right "buttons").
>
> I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of the
> Injunction against Jim.  That program was called "Tech Help Beta". The
> version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
> what-so-ever.  It does call them what they are and places them in the
> correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than the
> ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").
>
> Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue.  The
> "prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
> view as the "weaker link" in all this.  You see...  it's much easier for a
> high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a company
> that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry "works".
> Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it raises a few
> hackles in *all* the right places.
>
> Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
> figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com