[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: home alarm systems are for sissys

Subject: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
From: "Nathan W. Collier" <no@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:52:04 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1193928893.406565.198450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <TfKdnfSLr-8cI7fanZ2dnUVZ_rGrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <7a9d0ce709130@uwe> <Q1GWi.166899$Da.131351@pd7urf1no>

"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Q1GWi.166899$Da.131351@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> He's got two big dogs in the house.  I sincerely doubt he has a "Brinks
> System" (or if he does, he doesn't use it).

you would be wrong sir.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://p99sw99.com
http://PPStalk.com
http://P7talk.com

References:
- home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: datalines@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Nathan W. Collier
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Charlesmurphy via HomeKB.com
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Next by Message: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Previous by thread: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Next by thread: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home