[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CO2 Placement

Subject: Re: CO2 Placement
From: Frank Olson <Use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:12:15 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <rynHh.5712$P47.1027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BKadnXTGw8NUhXPYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <wv-dnbZ2YIl3gnPYnZ2dnUVZ_t6qnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <T5-dnVgR87yWvHPYnZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45ee2748$0$10303$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1173245790.093690.239170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jim wrote:

> I think if everyone would simply read all of the opinions that have
> been posted in this sage group in the past, regarding the placement of
> CO detectors and taking a consensus of all those opinions, it would be
> quite clear to anyone with any intelligence at all  ...... that it was
> ok to mount a CO detector anywhere. As long as the main panel had and
> earth ground ..... ummmm .... or didn't.
>

Please remember to ground your plastic back boxes too.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Petem
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Crash Gordon

References:
- CO2 Placement
  - From: Allan Waghalter
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Rich
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: CO2 Placement
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: OT Crowding the Interesection DOES NOT get you out there any faster...
Next by Message: Re: OT Crowding the Interesection DOES NOT get you out there any faster...
Previous by thread: Re: CO2 Placement
Next by thread: Re: CO2 Placement
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home