[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: new pad

Subject: Re: new pad
From: Coal Miner <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:43:15 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1170108745.659352.262630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <jixvh.14669$uC6.10830@trnddc02> <1170168652.773956.231100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45bf60ea$0$10309$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EQJvh.5784$fC2.754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1170175102.384855.301570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cs-dnQGnE4XHRyLYnZ2dnUVZ_uGjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <crSvh.830185$5R2.521985@pd7urf3no> <Cf-dnT3Pv5JktV3YnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:26:20 -0500, "Robert L Bass"
<no-sales-spam@bassburglaralarms> wrote:

>The only issue is whether he can get the code defaulted since ADT is about as likely to give him access as you are to
>admit you lied.

Takeovers of these panels are trivial.  Just about every installer
from any company knows ADT installer codes.  Why don't you post ADT
codes like you did the Honeywell passwords?

You are hardly in a position to accuse someone of lying.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new pad
  - From: Roland
- Re: new pad
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- new pad
  - From: fenwayfool
- Re: new pad
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: new pad
  - From: fenwayfool
- Re: new pad
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: new pad
  - From: pulic emeny
- Re: new pad
  - From: fenwayfool
- Re: new pad
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: new pad
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: new pad
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Wireless system recommendation
Next by Message: Re: Recomendation for reliable inexpensive monitoring service.
Previous by thread: Re: new pad
Next by thread: Re: new pad
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home