Re: 707 Roll.

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:
> Robert L Bass wrote:
> >>>Insert "inverted flight" flamez below:
> >>
> >>Frank, is that you?  RLB, you boob, proof that Frank was right, on you tube.
> >
> >
> > The poster knows full well that the famous 707 roll has nothing to do with the fictitious maneuver in Olson's lie.
>
> Here we go again...
>
>
> > No one has ever
> > snap rolled a 737 and lived to tell about it.
>
> I have pictures.  "Firetek's" seen them.
>
>
> > Furthermore, Boeing has never loaned a 737 to some idiot lime Olson so he could "test
> > his theory" about an aviation accident.
>
> You're right...  Boeing "never loaned a 737 to some idiot lime Olson"...
>
>
> > They don't load airliners to insurance companies for anything... ever.
>
> I beg to differ.  They "loan" aircraft to many different agencies.
>
>
> > Several of my
> > customers happen to be Boeing engineers.
>
> And not one has ever posted here.  Your "arguments" are based on
> "hearsay", supposition, and personal animus.  You wouldn't know the
> truth if someone hit you over the head with it.
>


ARE YOU LOOKING FOR VOLUNTEERS?



>
> > I showed them Olson's original lies about this and to a man the response was the same --
> > he's FOS; it never happened.
>
> And to a man, their responses are every bit as "fictitious" as your many
> installation fairy tales.
>
>
>    If you're dumb enough to believe that cock and bull story I can't
> help you.
> >
> >
>
>
> I beg to differ...  A USAir 737 experienced a sudden and unintentional
> rudder deflection.  The pilots recovered and were able to land safely.
> I believe the "angle of bank" exceeded 60 degrees (which you have stated
> many times as being unrecoverable in a large passenger airliner.  You're
> so FOS your eyes are brown...