[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wireless alarm goodies
I think they let him out of the asylum (seriously)...he's been gone for a
long while, maybe almost a year now.
"Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45a4fc86$0$16692$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| graciasferthealert
| whydiditalltasoddenreappear
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:45a4c794$0$10306$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
rolandyerwastinyerbreathpaulisfreekinmoronandyouwilltawkyerselfbluewifhim
| >
| > It's something in the air in Belgium.
| >
| >
| > "Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:45a4bd94$0$4857$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |> wireless alarm systems who aren't reliable when disturbed
| > | You seem to have some knowlwdge the rest of us here don't. Since you
| > know
| > of
| > | this RFI problem, why post about it here? Why not let all the wireless
| > | manufacturers know directly? I am sure they would each give your
concern
| > all
| > | of the consideration it is due.
| > |
| > |
| > | <.pull.@.shoot.> wrote in message
| > | news:dbp8q2l465p4ummadb29mj7936pia1jimt@xxxxxxxxxx
| > | > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:49:46 -0500, "Robert L Bass"
| > | > <robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > | > ... That is his central purpose -- getting folks angry.
| > | >
| > | > Robert,
| > | >
| > | > I like to inform owners and future owners about those miserable
| > | > wireless alarm systems who aren't reliable when disturbed (voluntary
| > | > or not) with RFI, no waning anymore.
| > | >
| > | > Throw them away....
| > | >
| > | > I'm sure Robert that YOU know how to circumvent that RFI problem,
but
| > | > you are to snugger and avoid to tell it to the public,
manufacturers.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > Paul
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home