Re: Wireless alarm goodies

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

graciasferthealert
whydiditalltasoddenreappear
"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45a4c794$0$10306$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> rolandyerwastinyerbreathpaulisfreekinmoronandyouwilltawkyerselfbluewifhim
>
> It's something in the air in Belgium.
>
>
> "Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:45a4bd94$0$4857$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |> wireless alarm systems who aren't reliable when disturbed
> | You seem to have some knowlwdge the rest of us here don't. Since you
> know
> of
> | this RFI problem, why post about it here? Why not let all the wireless
> | manufacturers know directly? I am sure they would each give your concern
> all
> | of the consideration it is due.
> |
> |
> | <.pull.@.shoot.> wrote in message
> | news:dbp8q2l465p4ummadb29mj7936pia1jimt@xxxxxxxxxx
> | > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:49:46 -0500, "Robert L Bass"
> | > <robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | > ... That is his central purpose -- getting folks angry.
> | >
> | > Robert,
> | >
> | > I like to inform owners and future owners about those miserable
> | > wireless alarm systems who aren't reliable when disturbed (voluntary
> | > or not) with RFI, no waning anymore.
> | >
> | > Throw them away....
> | >
> | > I'm sure Robert that YOU know how to circumvent that RFI problem, but
> | > you are to snugger and avoid to tell it to the public, manufacturers.
> | >
> | >
> | > Paul
> |
> |
>
>