Re: Wireless alarm goodies

[.pull.@.shoot.]

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:33:16 -0500, "Robert L Bass"
<robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> I'm sure Robert that YOU know how to circumvent that RFI
>> problem, but you are to snugger and avoid to tell it to the public,
>> manufacturers...
>
>You overestimate me.  I have yet to find any evidence of an RFI problem so I've made no effort to circumvent one.

Of course you don't find any evidence, the system is deaf on alarm
giving during RFI, its just dead and you don't know it, no warning.

Intruders with a small power transmitter on the frequency, they know
the system is bingo but they will not tell you that Robert.
Just continue to sell some more to your RFI problem ignorant clients.

When an intrusion occure and there is no alarm, its impossible to
prove that the system was ON and interfered..
 Even if the owner has been informed that there is a eventual RFI
muzzling possibility how will the owner proof its a bad technology who
is used for those alarm systems?

Paul

On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:01:01 +0100, .pull.@.shoot. wrote:
>
>Wireless alarm system are "deaf" and "dead" during the transmition
>with an external low power transmitter on the frequency.
> This problem is well known in telecommunication and is called "Radio
>Frequency Interference" (RFI).
>
>: RFI muzzle any possible incoming signal from the sensors.
>
>ALL brands, OLD or NEW are affected by RFI, the receiver is muzzled to
>dead and does no longer detected INTRUSION and other type of alarms.
>
>Some smart sellers guy's try to let you believe that RFI is detected,
>maybe, but RFI can't be avoided and signals are muzzled.
> This RFI problem is well know by intruders... Did you know?
>
> I know, RFI problems happen only to others but you..
>
>:TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved transmitter...
>:     For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems see at:
>    www.mipot.com
>    http://www.aurel.it/
>    www.rfsolutions.co.uk   ++++
> lookup how easy you can get a sheap RFI disturbing transmitter.
>
>Paul