[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Napco 2600 question

Subject: Re: Napco 2600 question
From: "alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:15:09 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <45ca413c$0$16341$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1170894297.402803.53360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <j0ils29u8unancpupf0n4n6gfuu5f19ju9@xxxxxxx> <45cbb28a$0$1390$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45cc8ee1$0$16350$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45cca04b$0$504$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45cc9a07$0$16401$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1171082268.545941.151390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dtjqs2ls41eeqob2kb50lah41u2hmoeaos@xxxxxxx> <45cd5b8d$0$1407$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4oqs2tst0poj8vgtlde4266t44nf7ebfu@xxxxxxx>

"Western Alarm" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b4oqs2tst0poj8vgtlde4266t44nf7ebfu@xxxxxxxxxx
> You can keep smart-ass comments to yourself if your only goal is to
> incite argument.

Aw, dang. You're taking all the fun away.
Oops, was that a smart-asses comment?? DOH!
js

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Russell Brill

References:
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Atomb
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: West Alarm
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Jim
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Western Alarm
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Napco 2600 question
  - From: Western Alarm

Prev by Message: Re: Man its frustrating to be in business some days.
Next by Message: Re: Napco 2600 question
Previous by thread: Re: Napco 2600 question
Next by thread: Re: Napco 2600 question
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home