[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: San Antonio

Subject: Re: San Antonio
From: "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:21:16 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <V%1dj.111916$eh4.106558@trnddc03> <Jn3dj.25099$DP1.19334@pd7urf2no> <0ba64ef0329f15e08d0b29e303070133np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55cdj.1319$ZI4.1124@trnddc08> <b178c01a0b4c97d3d125137484346d59np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <WFcdj.49$Ug5.38@trnddc06>

It appears to me that two things have been implied, the first is that you
are once again showing an interest in Grahams place of employment, the
second is that you are a jackass, actually the second appeared to more of a
direct statement.

Doug

--

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WFcdj.49$Ug5.38@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> It was implied,
>>
>> jackass.
>
> Nice sig.  What was implied?
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>
> ==============================>
> http://www.bassburgIaraIarms.com
> ==============================>

References:
- San Antonio
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: San Antonio
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: San Antonio
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: San Antonio
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: San Antonio
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: San Antonio
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: M.I 5`P ersecution - Molestati on d uring Trav el
Next by Message: Re: M.I 5`P ersecution - Molestati on d uring Trav el
Previous by thread: Re: San Antonio
Next by thread: Re: San Antonio
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home