Re: Stupid question

["Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>]

It wasn't a stupid question, it was just stupid to ask it here and expect a
straightforward  answer

Doug

--

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:475602e3$0$8799$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >It could be a bad question, one that some goof wrote and
>> didn't get reviewed properly.
>
> In most cases the answer should be in parallel at the last sensor. However
> that assumes that you will generate a trouble on open and alarm on short.
> If
> you were trying to be too clever by half, you could program certain panels
> to have the alarm triggers reversed and wire it a number of funny ways.
> You
> would be shot on site by the next technician that serviced the account
> however. Some panels use zone doubling that can be equally as irritating
> to
> service if done incorrectly.
>