Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim Rojas wrote:
> And here I thought they forgot all about me.
>
> Happy Holidays!
>
> Jim Rojas
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas
> Date:     Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:53:53 -0600
> From:     Thomas_Drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To:     jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
> DALLAS DIVISION
> BRINKS HOME SECURITY, INC., §
> §
> Plaintiff, §
> §
> v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 07-CV-0437-B
> §
> JIM ROJAS, §
> §
> Defendant. §
> ORDER
> Pending before the Court is Defendant?s Motion to Set Aside Preliminary
> Injunction and
> Impose Sanctions filed pro se on October 18, 2007 (doc. 38). Setting
> aside the specious nature of
> the motion itself, the Court denies Defendant?s Motion for the reasons
> set forth at the hearing on
> October 26, 2007 and in the Court?s Order granting Plaintiff?s Emergency
> Motion for Contempt
> and for Enforcement of the Court?s Preliminary Injunction (doc. 49).
> The Clerk of Court is requested to send this Order to the Defendant by
> mail return
> receipt requested and via electronic mail at jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> SO ORDERED.
> SIGNED November 30, 2007
> _________________________________
> JANE J. BOYLE
> UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
> Case 3:07-cv-00437 Document 51 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
>
>


Looks to me like they're "clearing the decks" for some major action to
commence.  If I were you, I'd be wary of anyone approaching the house
wearing a chicken (or purple dinosaur) suit.