Re: Psychology at work: How the Bunny-Boiler boils her bunnies - A must see event...

[Art Deco <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>"Art Deco" <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:250420070903555717%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> "Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:f0mpdh$bvc$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:16:46 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou podgy dunce. Thou
>>>>> pox-marked mannish coward. Ye gnashed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "DaRkAnGeL" <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:f0k101$glh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>> <to any reader>
>>>>> If you are interested in psychology, this is truly awesome stuff.
>>>>> Watch very carefully. There is no snippage from this point on to
>>>>> then end of the bunny-boiler's mind-magick trick being exposed
>>>>> here:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And from my point of view, in the absence of the pressure, we'd be
>>>>>> fine, I'd be working and we'd be planning my move to Australia.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Take note of the explicit notion of pressure.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, as stupid as it sounds, it seems as though (and again, I
>>>>>>> don't have all the facts - I have everyone's perception of the
>>>>>>> facts, motivations, and desires - which is all any of you have
>>>>>>> as well) if you two could just bloody well forgive each other,
>>>>>>> you might have a shot at
>>>>>>> reclaiming that love!! At the very least, you could stop giving
>>>>>>> each other black eyes on a daily basis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, DA, when I was 15, my father beat my face into a hardwood
>>>>>> floor, because I told my sister to stay out of my belongings--a
>>>>>> typical sibling situation met with violence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I stood up to him. I talked to the social worker at my school,
>>>>>> and I was removed from my home to foster care. Although the
>>>>>> beating was only the tip of the iceberg, it was sufficient to get
>>>>>> me out of the situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 1. Go back in time to a horrible event. Evoke highly
>>>>>            emotive images from said event.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Since then, I have never hesitated to stand up to anyone who
>>>>>> attempts to control me by force.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 2. Surreptitiously discard the previous notion of
>>>>>            "pressure" and introduce the emotively harsher notion
>>>>>            of "control by force."
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll do almost anything for love, if I'm asked, but I won't be
>>>>>> subjected to force.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 3. Conflate the ideas at 1. & 2. and drag the now
>>>>>            transmogrified idea across the intervening time spam and
>>>>>            apply it to the here and now.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] There are two sleights of hand in the entire mind-magick
>>>>> operation. Step 3 is where the *first* Svengali manoeuvre is
>>>>> actually hidden; the mind image at 1 is from the distant past and
>>>>> not related to the present in any way, yet the past is now neatly
>>>>> wrapped up in a reference to the present at 2 (qv "Since then"),
>>>>> and 2 is the notion that carries the now greatly amplified punch
>>>>> that is inherent in the change of the idea of "pressure" into
>>>>> "control by force."
>>>>>
>>>>>> In the case of Rick and me, on top of all the other force,
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 4: Thus both the real history and the very presence in the
>>>>> here and now of the current event are altered by the history of the
>>>>> other unrelated event. What remains is an implicit damning
>>>>> accusation that is dropped at the feet of the unsuspecting reader
>>>>> that is reinforced with the now altered idea of "additional force",
>>>>> (qv "on top of all the other force", note that "all the other
>>>>> force" is completely undefined; it is nebulous and inherently all
>>>>> encompassing.)
>>>>>
>>>>>> there was this at the very end:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c37776250
>>>>>> 43
>>>>>> aab93
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 5: This is the *second* Svengali manoeuvre. While the
>>>>> reader's head is busy dealing and coping with the horrible scenery
>>>>> in the mind image of emotional and physical abuse, the reader's
>>>>> attention is immediately taken from the bombshell that was just
>>>>> dropped and it is focused firmly on yet another event.
>>>>>
>>>>> The switch is very quick and the presumably horrified reader has
>>>>> likely not seen the *first* switch at all. Thus while still reeling
>>>>> from taking in the devastation of the first mind image, and not
>>>>> having time to inspect the whole process for soundness, the
>>>>> implicit damning accusation is left to set like jello in the
>>>>> unsuspecting reader's mind. In short, a "fact" has been created
>>>>> from two independent ideas and the unwitting mind is left to
>>>>> assume a fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> <bows to audience>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now for the encore... major snippage below; the context is not
>>>>> relevant. What is relevent is the impact of the statements and
>>>>> their implicit intent in light of the mind-magick trick exposed
>>>>> above:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You have this almost exactly the opposite of what it was
>>>>>
>>>>>> The perception you have never happened, just FYI.
>>>>>
>>>>> [^] Step 6: Question the reader's perceptions just in case the
>>>>> tricks from Step 1 to Step 5 are being quietly churned over and
>>>>> analysed in the back of the horrified reader's mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> <bow>
>>>>>
>>>>> "The emperor has no clothes."
>>>>
>>>> Nice work. Given the way Rodenta keeps on spinning in circles &
>>>> spewing the same rubbish, the traditional solution is to put
>>>> together a FAQ. I think the Bunny Boiler is just about due for one.
>>>
>>> The matching FAQ will be ready to go. :)
>>
>> Note:  no response to the expose of the word weaseling.
>
>It's coming. Keep your pants on, Deco. I'm trying to clear out the
>one-liners first.
>
>> Tholen does
>> exactly the same kind of tricks, although with far fewer words.
>
>I wouldn't miss the opportunity to respond to the original post.

I'm sure it will be filled with more of your tedious word weaseling.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco