Psychology at work: How the Bunny-Boiler boils her bunnies - A must see event...

["Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx>]

Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou podgy dunce. Thou pox-marked
mannish coward. Ye gnashed:

> "DaRkAnGeL" <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:f0k101$glh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<snipped>

<to any reader>
If you are interested in psychology, this is truly awesome stuff. Watch very
carefully. There is no snippage from this point on to then end of the
bunny-boiler's mind-magick trick being exposed here:

> And from my point of view, in the absence of the pressure, we'd be
> fine, I'd be working and we'd be planning my move to Australia.

[^] Take note of the explicit notion of pressure.

>> So, as stupid as it sounds, it seems as though (and again, I don't
>> have all the facts - I have everyone's perception of the facts,
>> motivations, and desires - which is all any of you have as well) if
>> you two could just bloody well forgive each other, you might have a
>> shot at
>> reclaiming that love!! At the very least, you could stop giving each
>> other black eyes on a daily basis.
>
> Well, DA, when I was 15, my father beat my face into a hardwood floor,
> because I told my sister to stay out of my belongings--a typical
> sibling situation met with violence.
>
> I stood up to him. I talked to the social worker at my school, and I
> was removed from my home to foster care. Although the beating was
> only the tip of the iceberg, it was sufficient to get me out of the
> situation.

[^] Step 1. Go back in time to a horrible event. Evoke highly emotive
            images from said event.

> Since then, I have never hesitated to stand up to anyone who attempts
> to control me by force.

[^] Step 2. Surreptitiously discard the previous notion of "pressure"
            and introduce the emotively harsher notion of "control by
            force."

> I'll do almost anything for love, if I'm asked, but I won't be
> subjected to force.

[^] Step 3. Conflate the ideas at 1. & 2. and drag the now
            transmogrified idea across the intervening time spam and
            apply it to the here and now.

[^] There are two sleights of hand in the entire mind-magick operation. Step
3 is where the *first* Svengali manoeuvre is actually hidden; the mind image
at 1 is from the distant past and not related to the present in any way, yet
the past is now neatly wrapped up in a reference to the present at 2 (qv
"Since then"), and 2 is the notion that carries the now greatly amplified
punch that is inherent in the change of the idea of "pressure" into "control
by force."

> In the case of Rick and me, on top of all the other force,

[^] Step 4: Thus both the real history and the very presence in the here and
now of the current event are altered by the history of the other unrelated
event. What remains is an implicit damning accusation that is dropped at the
feet of the unsuspecting reader that is reinforced with the now altered idea
of "additional force", (qv "on top of all the other force", note that "all
the other force" is completely undefined; it is nebulous and inherently all
encompassing.)

> there was this at the very end:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c3777625043aab93

[^] Step 5: This is the *second* Svengali manoeuvre. While the reader's head
is busy dealing and coping with the horrible scenery in the mind image of
emotional and physical abuse, the reader's attention is immediately taken
from the bombshell that was just dropped and it is focused firmly on yet
another event.

The switch is very quick and the presumably horrified reader has likely not
seen the *first* switch at all. Thus while still reeling from taking in the
devastation of the first mind image, and not having time to inspect the
whole process for soundness, the implicit damning accusation is left to set
like jello in the unsuspecting reader's mind. In short, a "fact" has been
created from two independent ideas and the unwitting mind is left to assume
a fact.

<bows to audience>

Now for the encore... major snippage below; the context is not relevant.
What is relevent is the impact of the statements and their implicit intent
in light of the mind-magick trick exposed above:

> You have this almost exactly the opposite of what it was

> The perception you have never happened, just FYI.

[^] Step 6: Question the reader's perceptions just in case the tricks from
Step 1 to Step 5 are being quietly churned over and analysed in the back of
the horrified reader's mind.

<bow>

"The emperor has no clothes."

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Wat ben jij een opgeschoten gepatenteerde billiefretter.