Re: Psychology at work: How the Bunny-Boiler boils her bunnies - A must see event...

[hoofprints <equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>
> "Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:f0mpdh$bvc$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:16:46 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> > <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou podgy dunce. Thou
> >> pox-marked mannish coward. Ye gnashed:
> >>
> >>> "DaRkAnGeL" <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>> news:f0k101$glh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> <snipped>
> >>
> >> <to any reader>
> >> If you are interested in psychology, this is truly awesome stuff.
> >> Watch very carefully. There is no snippage from this point on to
> >> then end of the bunny-boiler's mind-magick trick being exposed here:
> >>
> >>> And from my point of view, in the absence of the pressure, we'd be
> >>> fine, I'd be working and we'd be planning my move to Australia.
> >>
> >> [^] Take note of the explicit notion of pressure.
> >>
> >>>> So, as stupid as it sounds, it seems as though (and again, I don't
> >>>> have all the facts - I have everyone's perception of the facts,
> >>>> motivations, and desires - which is all any of you have as well) if
> >>>> you two could just bloody well forgive each other, you might have a
> >>>> shot at
> >>>> reclaiming that love!! At the very least, you could stop giving
> >>>> each other black eyes on a daily basis.
> >>>
> >>> Well, DA, when I was 15, my father beat my face into a hardwood
> >>> floor, because I told my sister to stay out of my belongings--a
> >>> typical sibling situation met with violence.
> >>>
> >>> I stood up to him. I talked to the social worker at my school, and I
> >>> was removed from my home to foster care. Although the beating was
> >>> only the tip of the iceberg, it was sufficient to get me out of the
> >>> situation.
> >>
> >> [^] Step 1. Go back in time to a horrible event. Evoke highly emotive
> >>            images from said event.
> >>
> >>> Since then, I have never hesitated to stand up to anyone who
> >>> attempts to control me by force.
> >>
> >> [^] Step 2. Surreptitiously discard the previous notion of "pressure"
> >>            and introduce the emotively harsher notion of "control by
> >>            force."
> >>
> >>> I'll do almost anything for love, if I'm asked, but I won't be
> >>> subjected to force.
> >>
> >> [^] Step 3. Conflate the ideas at 1. & 2. and drag the now
> >>            transmogrified idea across the intervening time spam and
> >>            apply it to the here and now.
> >>
> >> [^] There are two sleights of hand in the entire mind-magick
> >> operation. Step 3 is where the *first* Svengali manoeuvre is
> >> actually hidden; the mind image at 1 is from the distant past and
> >> not related to the present in any way, yet the past is now neatly
> >> wrapped up in a reference to the present at 2 (qv "Since then"), and
> >> 2 is the notion that carries the now greatly amplified punch that is
> >> inherent in the change of the idea of "pressure" into "control by
> >> force."
> >>
> >>> In the case of Rick and me, on top of all the other force,
> >>
> >> [^] Step 4: Thus both the real history and the very presence in the
> >> here and now of the current event are altered by the history of the
> >> other unrelated event. What remains is an implicit damning
> >> accusation that is dropped at the feet of the unsuspecting reader
> >> that is reinforced with the now altered idea of "additional force",
> >> (qv "on top of all the other force", note that "all the other force"
> >> is completely undefined; it is nebulous and inherently all
> >> encompassing.)
> >>
> >>> there was this at the very end:
> >>>
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c3777625043aab93
> >>
> >> [^] Step 5: This is the *second* Svengali manoeuvre. While the
> >> reader's head is busy dealing and coping with the horrible scenery
> >> in the mind image of emotional and physical abuse, the reader's
> >> attention is immediately taken from the bombshell that was just
> >> dropped and it is focused firmly on yet another event.
> >>
> >> The switch is very quick and the presumably horrified reader has
> >> likely not seen the *first* switch at all. Thus while still reeling
> >> from taking in the devastation of the first mind image, and not
> >> having time to inspect the whole process for soundness, the implicit
> >> damning accusation is left to set like jello in the unsuspecting
> >> reader's mind. In short, a "fact" has been created from two
> >> independent ideas and the unwitting mind is left to assume a fact.
> >>
> >> <bows to audience>
> >>
> >> Now for the encore... major snippage below; the context is not
> >> relevant. What is relevent is the impact of the statements and their
> >> implicit intent in light of the mind-magick trick exposed above:
> >>
> >>> You have this almost exactly the opposite of what it was
> >>
> >>> The perception you have never happened, just FYI.
> >>
> >> [^] Step 6: Question the reader's perceptions just in case the
> >> tricks from Step 1 to Step 5 are being quietly churned over and
> >> analysed in the back of the horrified reader's mind.
> >>
> >> <bow>
> >>
> >> "The emperor has no clothes."
> >
> > Nice work. Given the way Rodenta keeps on spinning in circles &
> > spewing the same rubbish, the traditional solution is to put together
> > a FAQ. I think the Bunny Boiler is just about due for one.
>
> The matching FAQ will be ready to go. :)

Looks like another Fatal Attraction bad scene.
Oh yeah Rhonda, you had it so rough during your lifetime...
You whiner.
Try having a daddy that is in the Nixon Administration during the
Watergate years!!
And then try to cope with *every single* one of your democratic asses
for friends knocking Nixon every time the conversations turned to
politics!!!
You have no idea, WHINER!!!!!!!!!!!
You have nothing to WHINE about, so STFU!!!!!
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
> as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
> are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

--

Hoof
[....]
message ID     <etbvu5$dv$8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>The REVOLTING;
REPULSIVE; REPUGNANT  _* Kimberly Barnard*_  aka *Kymberly Barnard* aka
*Kali* 'responded to Jade' who was trolled into SPP by the Moderator of
SPPM _ kali_:
: Does that gibbering k00k Lynn "goofprints" Lyons still post there?
Let me consult my crystal ball for activities of the
Galactically Kill Filed net.deceased:
Yes, and now she is ranting against homosexuality.
 : Jade
:
Kali
[/]

"If It Hurts, Don't Do It"!
*Hetero* PRIDE !!  Caught in the 'crosshairs' between Gay Pride Issues
and Hetero-Pride issues far too long.

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker. © 2003