[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: EXTRA: Graham teh Kook admits to serious failure (Re: Dammit.. How to get 2 zones and power from a 4-conductor)



Nelson Muntz <none@xxxxxxxxx> Thou decayed dotant. Thou instrument of
darkness. Ye repeated:

> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>
>> "Nelson Muntz" <none@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:4o1n23dkq7hi8845qud328qucdnf1c9q15@xxxxxxx
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>
>>>> You are not even effective as a human being, Graham.
>>>
>>>
>>> Say's the idiot that can't find a girlfriend on his own continent,
>>> then horribly screws up when he manages to find someone to
>>> manipulate (for a few months) 8000 miles away.
>>
>> How many times do you need to be told that your issue with Kadaitcha
>> Man has nothing to do with me?
>
> Let me get this right.. His failure to do right by you is off-limits,
> yes?  So all of his net-trolling and manipulation had nothing to do
> with you getting involved with him in the first place?

Don't look now but there go all your previous assertions about not using
Rhonda as an excuse to get to me, netk0oK.

> You didn't even bother to ask WHY we had the problem in the first
> place.  My sneaky deed was NOT unprovoked - far from it.

Oops! You need to be told that the word sneaky is not a suitable euphemism
for wire fraud criminal activity.

HTH

>> The fact that you continue to bring me into it certainly gives lie to
>> your claim of concern for my welfare.
>
> If that's what you think, I can't help it.

Don't look now, netK0oK but you seem to be sinking, fast.

> My concern is genuine, but fading fast.

Watch...

> I now see why there may be credence in the horrible
> nickname you received.

Your concern is so genuine and fading so fast that it dissolved into a flame
in the very next sentence.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

> Why do you think I didn't jump on the offer to
> get those Tastycakes?  It was because I didn't want to send you my
> home address.

BWAHAHAHAHA! Your hindisgh is so perfect you must have eyes in your
arsehole.

>>> Yeah- tell me more about how effective you are, Ricky.
>>
>> He's got major IQ points on you, and he's neither a fucking racist
>> nor a net abuser.
>
> He's a fucking lunatic, and the worst net-abuser I've ever witnessed.

Really?

> I'm not racist either

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Calling Mexicans "wetbacks", their sick children
"Pedro's kids", and calling black-skinned women "nappy-headed-ho's" is not
racist?

> - my prediction in the rant was true after all,
> wasn't it?   Take off those rose-colored glasses.
>
>> That puts him well ahead of you from the starting gate.
>
> Uh-huh..  You two deserve each other.

Well, no, that's not true. Firstly, and far less importantly, my defence of
myself does not require any measure of deserving on anyone else's part; none
whatsoever. The evidence for the inherent truth in that statement is seen in
the fact that I'm now beating you up for your statement there.

If I felt any third party whom you are attacking were deserving in any way
whatsoever then I'd just sit back and let you go for it, and I wouldn't bat
an eyelid; indeed perhaps I'd be right behind you, slurping at you by
thanking you for your understanding, encouragement and support. Perhaps you
haven't noticed that I'm not doing that.

Secondly, and vitally, some, far too many, adults have had horrible crimes
perpetrated upon them in their childhood at the hands of grossly sick mental
freaks of nature. Since the child becomes the adult, whatever happened to
the child is, in one way or another, part and parcel of the package that is
the adult, no matter how well the adult deals with any supposed awful
childhood incident. Your fuckwitted netk0oK statement then necessarily
entails that your targets are also deserving of every disgraceful thing that
may have been meted out to them as children.

I am certain that you will not understand any of that at all since you are
clearly a sociopath. I am also certain that you will not ever comprehend the
notion that you have tacitly put your tawdry seal of approval on child rape,
child bashing, child prostitution, child slave labour, and any and all other
subhuman acts of exploitation and abuse perpetrated on children the world
over who are fortunate to live long enough to become adults.

Only a complete and utterly fucked in the head psychopath and sociopath,
that would be you, would require that any adult deserved the hideous
treatment they may have received but neither asked for nor deserved as a
child.

You are one utterly sick fuck, Graham teh k0oK. I am going to tear your
fucked up psyche apart and piss into your empty cranium; and I make that as
a solemn promise to you.

You can make your impending netDE4th less painful for yourself by shutting
the fuck right up about other people and leaving anything to do with them
right out of your argument with me.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nu vind ik je een tepeltrekkende platgeneukte mormel.


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home