[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anyone work with foam systems
To expand a bit upon Frank's post, manufacturer's training helps but
certainly isn't mandatory. Inspection usually involves disconnecting the
squib or solenoid valve and ensuring all the initiating devices annunciate
at the panel, the programmed release sequence is initiated, and the panel
provides the proper output to discharge the system and shut down required
devices. It's also a good idea to test the "cancel discharge" functions
which will only work if an automatic intiating device (heat, smoke, or flame
detector) is activated. The "manual discharge" will do exactly that,
usually with no chance for user intervention once activated (although I have
seen it done in one large hangar, but that one was "weird"). On the
mechanical side, you have to weigh the cylinders, check pressures, nozzles,
etc. One more thing. Before you initiate any testing, make sure to move
valuable equipment away from the area. It's not a good idea to flood
someone's nice expensive Learjet with foam (although I hear it cleans up all
bright and shiny). :-)
"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dwm5h.290326$1T2.219579@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> nick markowitz wrote:
> > Have a petro customer where i just changed out a releasing panel for
there
> > foam system which protects the gasoline loading rack. They said they
are
> > having an extremely hard time getting techs to service there national
foam
> > system any one familar with what it takes to fully inspect and cerify
them.
> >
> >
>
>
> Yup.
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home