[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Law Suit in NJ

Subject: Re: Law Suit in NJ
From: G. Morgan <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:28:18 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <GfL4h.10484$1v.9076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40a5b5b36d3af22c9bd45f3ecbc0fe02@xxxxxxxxx> <aY25h.13517$U76.7482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:58:12 -0500, "Bob Worthy"
<securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Kirchenbaum, being so close to NJ, with him being in the alarm
>contract business, most likely would have been vocal about it. Maybe the
>cost of doing business in NJ just went up or the tides may get reversed,
>have the client name us as additionallly insured.


If one uses his contracts will he provide the legal for free?


--

-Graham
(remove the double e's to email)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Roland

References:
- Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Bob Worthy

Prev by Message: Re: CCTV lens calculator
Next by Message: Re: The results are in
Previous by thread: Re: Law Suit in NJ
Next by thread: Re: Law Suit in NJ
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home