Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

["Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert,
I beg to disagree with you on this one.  The cost of replacing a board is so
low as to virtually eliminate your argument on fear of takeovers.  I don't
lock a panel out but do use my own programmers code.  The reason for not
wanting the owner to have access to the panel is to prevent him from
accidentally changing a setting that will prevent the system from
functioning correctly and therefore exposing us to litigation.

"Robert L Bass" <robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9NKdnapBnpyMeNLYnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> | And I am tired of those who think this is why
>> | when it's not, THE REASON it...
>
> And I am tired of you posting this BS.  The primary reason for panel
> lockout codes is to make it more difficult for homeowneres to switch
> service providers or go it alone.  It has nothing to do with streamlining
> anything.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>
> =============================>
> Bass Home Electronics
> 941-866-1100
> 4883 Fallcrest Circle
> Sarasota · Florida · 34233
> http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
> =============================>
>