[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

Subject: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:06:45 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <jKU0h.22068$GN5.11343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d31h.14899$DH5.2174@trnddc04> <wqidnVvDrIIqD9vYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <454fd9d8$0$3571$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9NKdnapBnpyMeNLYnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Robert L Bass wrote:
>>| And I am tired of those who think this is why
>>| when it's not, THE REASON it...
>
>
> And I am tired of you posting this BS.  The primary reason for panel lockout codes is to make it more difficult for homeowneres to
> switch service providers or go it alone.  It has nothing to do with streamlining anything.
>

Nope.  Once again, you "miss" the real reason and fill the group with
more of your Basspeak.  I wouldn't expect someone without insurance,
licensing or bonding to care one way or the other anyway.

References:
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: cellular home security system questions
Next by Message: Re: cellular home security system questions
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Next by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home