[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

Subject: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
From: G. Morgan <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:52:28 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <jKU0h.22068$GN5.11343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d31h.14899$DH5.2174@trnddc04> <wqidnVvDrIIqD9vYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <454fd9d8$0$3571$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9NKdnapBnpyMeNLYnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:44:43 -0500, "Robert L Bass"
<robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> | And I am tired of those who think this is why
>> | when it's not, THE REASON it...
>
>And I am tired of you posting this BS.  The primary reason for panel lockout codes is to make it more difficult for homeowneres to
>switch service providers or go it alone.  It has nothing to do with streamlining anything.


Why are you telling Crash that?

--

-Graham
(remove the double e's to email)

References:
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Any tips for a consumer about to purchase a system & contract?
Next by Message: Re: Let's say I break into your house 9, was: Good news for US -- Secure Fence Act of 2006
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Next by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home