[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Legality of video survaillence

Subject: Re: Legality of video survaillence
From: Robert L Bass <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 19:10:31 -0300
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <SSIMf.61397$PL5.47792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ZpJMf.36652$UD1.19975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eQKMf.15716$rL5.10383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <KiLMf.418$dj2.78@trndny04> <E91Of.65554$PL5.26835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> If the cameras are being used for safety and not criminal
> prosecuiton for thefts etc . is how I have gotten around
> the issue.

You might want to mention this to your attorney.  If you sign an
agreement saying that the video cameras are for safety and not
for prosecution you might not be able to use a future recording
in a criminal or civil proceeding against a dishonest employee.

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

Bass Burglar Alarms
The Online DIY Store
http://www.BassBurglarAlarms.com

--

Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large
groups.

References:
- Re: Legality of video survaillence
  - From: Tom Gardner

Prev by Message: Re: Power Supply
Next by Message: Re: Everywhere Man
Previous by thread: Re: Legality of video survaillence
Next by thread: Re: Legality of video survaillence
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home