Re: Legality of video survaillence

["Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:E91Of.65554$PL5.26835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Nick Markowitz" <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:KiLMf.418$dj2.78@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >I get this problem from unions all the time. Unless they agree to it in
> > there negotiations they feel it is a contract violation. if the cameras
> > are
> > being used for safety and not criminal prosecuiton for thefts etc . is
how
> > I
> > have gotten around the issue.
> >
>
> Well, the union signed-off the next day after I started considering going
to
> monthly paychecks, mandatory overtime, swing shifts, daily exercise, daily
> random drug and booze tests...etc.  It appears I still have a little say
> about how I run my business.

ROFL!!