Re: Just a suggestion

["Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I can accept your argument.  My main challenge was why you would say, "Top
posting is for fools and losers".  I don't think there are many of these
participating in the NG.
Allan


"Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RTRlg.14907$_c1.14503@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Standards change, when more people are top posting than bottom posting,
> then it will become the de facto standard, no matter what the purists may
> say.
>
> Doug L
>
> --
>
> "John J" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:kpLlg.38473$No1.5202@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:8jKlg.119492$dW3.20695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> "John J" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:WQJlg.1032726$xm3.353326@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> "Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:8tJlg.69628$4L1.38695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> .... and top post so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of
>>>>> the message....
>>>>
>>>> Top posting is for fools and losers
>>>>
>>> Why do you say that?
>>
>> Beacuse we read from top to bottom, also its been the standard for many
>> years, well before MS got into the market.
>>
>> http://www.dickgaughan.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq08-topp.html
>> http://www.redballoon.net/~snorwood/quote-rant.shtml
>> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>