Re: Why not use two seperate panels when designing a high end system?

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have one _very_ paranoid residential client where we did exactly
that..everything is reduntant. Two alarm panels, two contacts on all
openings, double motions, glassbreaks, everything! Including two
Uplinks...nice system...a bit of an overkill imo, but nice...and very
expensive.

I did do one jewelry store where we put a separate small system on the safe
and another for the store itself..but this is not typical imo.


"SecurityNovice" <nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lq6ig.212763$5Z.177919@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Here is something that to me seems so obvious, but something that I have
| never seen or employed personnaly.  Lets say for example I am designing a
| system for a high end jewelry store.  I call for my glass breaks, my
| motions, a Potter vibration on the safe, high security contacts on the
| doors, and maybe a mat..  then I go home and the customer feels safe.
|
| But for just another 175, the customer could buy a seperate panel just for
| the interior safe contact and the vibration detector.  This way, if the
| intruder found his way into the store and bypassed the perimeter alarm, he
| would think he is home free.. But when he gets to the mother load, he is
met
| by another independent syste.  Of course, the panel would be installed
away
| from the primary panel and a radio or cell could be used to transmit the
| signal.. My question is.. it's so obvious that it would be money well
spent,
| why does no one do it???  Am I not seeing the big picture?
|
|
|