[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera



In article <1151391530.671233.261280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
bitsyboffin@xxxxxxxxx writes
>Prometheus wrote:
>
>> cost more than my proposal. In fact I begin to question why your are so
>> insistent on a surveillance system, what or who do you really want to
>> record?
>
>I'm not dead-set on any surveillance, I just thought it was a cheap and
>easy way to try and put a stop to the problem.

It will antagonize people whose only offence is being ordinary negligent
human beings not of being malicious or dishonest, you could loose
members. The art of distrusting people is not to tell them that you
distrust them, that way you get more from them.

--
Ian             G8ILZ


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home