[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

Subject: Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
From: teflon nonstick <teflon1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:19:25 GMT
Newsgroups: nz.tech, rec.photo.digital, alt.security.alarms
References: <1151300045.515892.131920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C0C56F5F.A1C2%teflon1@xxxxxxxxx> <C0C5757E.A425%teflon1@xxxxxxxxx> <1151318344.021461.191170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C0C57B5A.AA31%teflon1@xxxxxxxxx> <1151319754.586262.249310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 26/6/06 12:02, in article
1151319754.586262.249310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"bitsyboffin@xxxxxxxxx" <bitsyboffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> teflon nonstick wrote:
>
>> How about a newsletter declaring an increase in membership fees, to either
>> pay for a security firm, or increase the insurance cover.
>> Alternatively, lock the place up at fixed times. Either one should grab the
>> attention.
>
> The phrase ton of bricks comes to mind ;-)  It might just have to come
> to that yet.
>
Good luck.

References:
- Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: bitsyboffin
- Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: teflon nonstick
- Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: teflon nonstick
- Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: bitsyboffin
- Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: teflon nonstick
- Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
  - From: bitsyboffin

Prev by Message: Re: From DVR to Off Site Video Storage
Next by Message: Re: Is swann security good enough
Previous by thread: Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
Next by thread: Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home