[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future

Subject: Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
From: "McGin" <McGin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:25:41 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <44b28e17$0$23738$a8266bb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44b28ebe$0$23777$a8266bb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <HdydnXi9Qb8WlC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HdydnXi9Qb8WlC7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "McGinnn" <McGinnn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:44b28ebe$0$23777$a8266bb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Crash with email id robosama@xxxxxxxxx or robosama at gmail.com is added
> to
>> the complaint list today to force him to TESTIFY in court if he got any
>> email or phone call from his fbi contacts about "my password" last night.
>
> I also spoke with the FBI about your password so you might as well add me
> too






I wont as of today cos you are a LOW IQ EVIL AMERICAN GOVT DICKSUCKING SLAVE
dog.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
  - From: Crash

References:
- Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
  - From: McGinnn
- Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
  - From: McGinnn
- Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: Scantronic 9800 bF every 5 minutes
Next by Message: Re: Can security experts break an ADT alarm system
Previous by thread: Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
Next by thread: Re: Crash will be REQUIRED to TESTIFY in court in the future
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home